I was just watching an old Star Trek episode where the Enterprise gets stuck in an asteroid field that emanated high levels of radiation and threatened to destroy the ship and everyone on it.
Captain Picard’s and Geordi’s first instinct was to overpower the radiation field. This didn’t work because the radiation field matched in equal and opposite degree any of the ship’s power bursts. In fact it just consumed the ship’s power source faster.
The second option was to have their advanced computer calculate millions of simulations per second in order to navigate out of the asteroid field unscathed, but the computer couldn’t compensate for small variations in navigation and showed inconsistent results, in the meantime they were running out of time as the radiation levels reached life threatening levels and the ship’s power source continue to diminish.
The were faced with two choices, turn the ship over to the computer and take their chances, or shot down everything and use the remaining energy source to power the thrusters and manually navigate their way out of the asteroid field.
So what to do? Bet on the computer and it’s flawless calculating precision or take your chances with human ingenuity.
So you can guess what Captain Picard did … he took the controls, maneuvered through the smaller asteroids, headed straight for the biggest one and used its gravitational pull to slingshot around and get clear. Was there ever any doubt?
This kind of got me thinking about technology and about us …
Two points of views came to mind in particular. The first is in relation to the still pervading mentality that social technology or technology in general makes human relationships less personal.
Anyone that has ever met, collaborated, or created scaled efficiencies online can attest to actually the opposite. The evolution in communication technology has actually enhanced our social ecologies in just about every area of human endeavor. This trend with its imperfections, granted, will continue to increase and benefit those who craft at it.
The second is actually the exacerbated version of the first.
Some extreme sects of our society promiscuously believe and amplify the religion of let’s call it, Technologism. This dogma preaches technology as the salvation of humanity, in addition to selling us the idea that quality of life is synonymous to technological progress. I think this particular way of looking at technology actually enslaves us, as in fact any blind faith in anything would.
We must be extremely vigilant of any technology(ies) that in the name of itself offers an unparalleled an unique way of life. The moment that we replace human creativity and ingenuity with precision, calculation, logic, reason and even some forms of truth, we are in the verge of becoming slaves of the very things that claim to liberate us.
It’s obvious I don’t place a lot of stock in technological advances as the main barometer for success and accomplishments as a species. But if technological evolution meant human evolution we would be in a very different place right now! … I do believe however that in the search for that balance is where our true growth and maturity lies.
What’s your take on this … Do you believe our technological level has surpassed our capacity to be better human beings?